A noção de competências e o aperfeiçoamento dos trabalhadores do poder judiciário goiano

Abstract

The main objective of this work was to investigate and analyze the training of workers in the judiciary in Goiás and the institutionalization of the notion of competences. Does the research problem constitute the understanding of: How is the continuing education institutionalized by competences and directed to the servers of the Judiciary Power in Goiás? To this end, a qualitative research of an exploratory-descriptive nature of the regulations inherent to the Goiás judiciary was carried out (Resolution CNJ No. 192/2014; Law No. 17.663/2012; Resolution TJGO No. 14/2012; Management Plans and Plans between 2009 and 2019). In the theoretical framework McClelland (1973), Boyatzis (1982), Spencer, LM & Spencer, SM (1993), Parry (1996), American authors who took the notion of competences to the logic of behavioral psychology - and also the French authors Le Bortef (1997) and Zarifian (1999), who from a sociological perspective reflected on professionalism and changes in the world of work. And Brazilian authors, Kuenzer (1999), Ramos (2002), Saviani (2005), who proposed to discuss Education, specifically Professional Education, under the threshold of critical-historical-theory, basing their reflections in the light of the sociology of work, taking work as an educational principle from the perspective of worker emancipation. Finally, understanding the logic of skills for training and improvement in the Goiás Judiciary, we have the presentation of the educational product that had as its general objective the proposal of continuing education from the perspective of Professional and Technological Education (ProfEPT), starting from the work as an educational principle to expand the capacity to mobilize knowledge, skills and attitudes for the performance of their work functions, broadening the horizon of possibilities to reach omnilateralism in the training and improvement of workers in the Goiás judiciary.